| From: | jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Cc: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: doc: create table improvements |
| Date: | 2025-10-16 03:28:43 |
| Message-ID: | CACJufxFgZtLENzJkZZssKdWEfHo1hk9uyC0h3JcGJJb19XRJQQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
hi.
-<phrase>where <replaceable
class="parameter">column_constraint</replaceable> is:</phrase>
+<phrase>where <replaceable>persistence_mode</replaceable> is: </phrase>
+
+[ GLOBAL | LOCAL ] { TEMPORARY | TEMP } |
+UNLOGGED
we can just do it with one line:
[ GLOBAL | LOCAL ] { TEMPORARY | TEMP } | UNLOGGED
most of the time, the patch using:
<replaceable>persistence_mode</replaceable>
<replaceable>oversize_storage</replaceable>
for column_constraint we are using
<replaceable class="parameter">column_constraint</replaceable>
do we need change it to
<replaceable class="parameter">persistence_mode</replaceable>
<replaceable class="parameter">oversize_storage</replaceable>
?
I don't know the purpose of this extra ``"class="parameter"``.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2025-10-16 03:31:57 | Re: Extend documentation for pg_stat_replication.backend_xmin |
| Previous Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2025-10-16 03:01:51 | Re: Should we say "wal_level = logical" instead of "wal_level >= logical" |