Re: Prevent printing "next step instructions" in initdb and pg_upgrade

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Prevent printing "next step instructions" in initdb and pg_upgrade
Date: 2021-02-07 10:21:05
Message-ID: CABUevEzPC+DDbEg=1FPL_OdHKLFOBPhuu+Sh9qm_1VY+e1PR1Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 4:21 PM Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 2021-01-17 14:38, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 11:53 AM Peter Eisentraut
> > <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> >>
> >> After pondering this again, I think we can go with initdb
> >> --no-instructions, as in your patch.
> >>
> >> As a minor nitpick, I would leave out the
> >>
> >> else
> >> printf(_("\nSuccess.\n"));
> >>
> >> in the --no-instructions case.
> >
> > OK, thanks. I have applied it as such, with that message moved inside
> > the if statement.
>
> It appears that there is an extra blank line in the initdb output before
> "Success" now.

Oops, clearly it does.

That said, the full output is:

"""
Success. You can now start the database server using:

bin/pg_ctl -D /tmp/data -l logfile start

Success.
"""

Isn't the whole "Success." at the end redundant here, and we should
just end the message after the pg_ctl command? So not just the extra
newline, but the whole thing?

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2021-02-07 11:45:42 Re: [HACKERS] Custom compression methods
Previous Message Joel Jacobson 2021-02-07 09:54:51 jsonb_array_elements_recursive()