| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification |
| Date: | 2016-03-10 20:03:42 |
| Message-ID: | CABUevEw7fwMKU6VTTAz7+m0z38J7gCmu=CEMPoRKHQk8inWzGA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 8:45 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> > ISTM, that there's good enough reasons to go either way; I don't see
> > what we're gaining by making these private. That just encourages
> > copy-paste coding.
>
> +1. Frustrating Citus's attempt to open-source their stuff is not in
> the project's interest.
>
>
Agreed. And it's not like we're very restrictive with this in a lot of
other parts of the code. While we shouldn't go out of our way for
forks/extensions, this seems like a very reasonable tradeoff.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-03-10 20:05:39 | Re: Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-03-10 20:03:41 | Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification |