Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification
Date: 2016-03-10 19:45:37
Message-ID: CA+TgmobGMoubY9i67eLViyd2PW7v9ruERh3uEtjZQdB2GmL21A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> ISTM, that there's good enough reasons to go either way; I don't see
> what we're gaining by making these private. That just encourages
> copy-paste coding.

+1. Frustrating Citus's attempt to open-source their stuff is not in
the project's interest.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2016-03-10 19:47:49 Re: proposal: function parse_ident
Previous Message Gilles Darold 2016-03-10 19:45:36 Re: Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function