Re: Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Gilles Darold <gilles(dot)darold(at)dalibo(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function
Date: 2016-03-10 20:05:39
Message-ID: 6632.1457640339@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Gilles Darold <gilles(dot)darold(at)dalibo(dot)com> writes:
> Then, should I have to use an alternate file to store the information or
> implement a bidirectional communication with the syslogger?

I'd just define a new single-purpose file $PGDATA/log_file_name
or some such.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2016-03-10 20:20:08 Re: Add generate_series(date,date) and generate_series(date,date,integer)
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2016-03-10 20:03:42 Re: WIP: Upper planner pathification