Re: Possible inaccurate description of wal_compression in docs

From: Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jingtang Zhang <mrdrivingduck(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Possible inaccurate description of wal_compression in docs
Date: 2025-08-20 01:01:12
Message-ID: CABPTF7VTUX_JnWtQzk_SBTckfpxSfFuENawWCxCLydX9Ay2tCA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 11:22 PM Jingtang Zhang <mrdrivingduck(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > Do any of you have a specific wording in mind?
>
> 'Like when FPW is on …' would be okay, or '(e.g., when FPW is on …)'
> would be formal?
>

+1 for e.g.

Best,
Xuneng

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2025-08-20 01:25:43 Re: Raw parse tree is not dumped to log
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2025-08-20 00:43:41 Re: memory leak in logical WAL sender with pgoutput's cachectx