Re: Possible inaccurate description of wal_compression in docs

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jingtang Zhang <mrdrivingduck(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Possible inaccurate description of wal_compression in docs
Date: 2025-08-21 04:28:28
Message-ID: aKagbNf73q8XqXmg@paquier.xyz
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 09:01:12AM +0800, Xuneng Zhou wrote:
> +1 for e.g.

e.g. feels more elegant, so I have reused your suggestion, and applied
the result down to v13.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2025-08-21 04:53:09 Re: Remove traces of long in dynahash.c
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2025-08-21 04:04:40 Re: Logical Replication of sequences