Re: Possible inaccurate description of wal_compression in docs

From: Jingtang Zhang <mrdrivingduck(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, xunengzhou(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: Possible inaccurate description of wal_compression in docs
Date: 2025-08-13 15:22:34
Message-ID: CAPsk3_BfXWZva5TidqyjWtNv6=dGZqfj2Hvq0vujTctVsc=N8w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Do any of you have a specific wording in mind?

'Like when FPW is on …' would be okay, or '(e.g., when FPW is on …)'
would be formal?

--
Regards, Jingtang

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2025-08-13 15:27:02 Re: Parallel Apply
Previous Message Andres Freund 2025-08-13 15:16:24 Re: Adding basic NUMA awareness