From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: perlcritic |
Date: | 2015-09-01 04:24:56 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqTmkjObHbihQy9ykSHzt=wmfShbw1zz_rUz-z5e4iO3rw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> We now have 80+ Perl files in our tree, and it's growing. Some of those
> files were originally written for Perl 4, and the coding styles and
> quality are quite, uh, divergent. So I figured it's time to clean up
> that code a bit. I ran perlcritic over the tree and cleaned up all the
> warnings at level 5 (the default, least severe).
Do you think we should be concerned about the increased difficulty to
backpatch fixes if this patch is applied? I personally think that's
fine to do this cleanup on HEAD only, still others may have a
different opinion.
> Testing guidelines:
> - msvc files need to be tested separately. I tested as best as I could
> on a non-Windows system.
And tested on Windows, I am not seeing failures.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Satoshi Nagayasu | 2015-09-01 04:29:29 | Re: pg_stat_statements query jumbling question |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2015-09-01 04:13:07 | Unicode mapping scripts cleanup |