Re: Hash Indexes

From: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hash Indexes
Date: 2016-10-01 18:31:54
Message-ID: CAM-w4HNgLF7ZUgF+dLdT=rP9oNj3V+pnoR4Noqn6-D2Ae67JiA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 2:11 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> For one thing, we can stop shipping a totally broken feature in release after release

For what it's worth I'm for any patch that can accomplish that.

In retrospect I think we should have done the hash-over-btree thing
ten years ago but we didn't and if Amit's patch makes hash indexes
recoverable today then go for it.

--
greg

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2016-10-01 19:04:18 Re: Macro customizable hashtable / bitmapscan & aggregation perf
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2016-10-01 18:19:21 Re: Macro customizable hashtable / bitmapscan & aggregation perf