Re: Error with index on unlogged table

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Fabrízio Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Error with index on unlogged table
Date: 2015-12-10 12:20:57
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 9:13 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On 2015-12-10 21:10:57 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> In short: should I send patches for all those things or are you on it?
> I'm on it. I don't think the new name you gave the function, and the new
> comment, are really an improvement. We already have 'SyncOneBuffer'
> (unusable for our purpose unfortunately), so going for Single here
> doesn't seem like a good idea.

OK, no problem. Thanks.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stas Kelvich 2015-12-10 12:41:39 Re: Speedup twophase transactions
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2015-12-10 12:19:46 Re: Is postgresql on Windows compatible with flex 2.6.0?