Re: Error with index on unlogged table

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Fabrízio Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Error with index on unlogged table
Date: 2015-12-10 12:13:18
Message-ID: 20151210121318.GA12890@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2015-12-10 21:10:57 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> In short: should I send patches for all those things or are you on it?

I'm on it. I don't think the new name you gave the function, and the new
comment, are really an improvement. We already have 'SyncOneBuffer'
(unusable for our purpose unfortunately), so going for Single here
doesn't seem like a good idea.

Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2015-12-10 12:19:46 Re: Is postgresql on Windows compatible with flex 2.6.0?
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2015-12-10 12:10:57 Re: Error with index on unlogged table