From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com, Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com, peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, marko(at)joh(dot)to, daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: psql: add \pset true/false |
Date: | 2015-12-08 11:51:56 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqT6B+E61m3R=8A=mUZAa+5w4BiA_JKneBa+z8RP9eyzzw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 7:18 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
<horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> At Sat, 5 Dec 2015 21:05:29 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in <CAB7nPqSXcdM-5nFWDf8zuKmW8j_ooE6zYRqYQasp0fjKxKDX2A(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
> > Regarding the patch, I
> > would tend to think that we should just reject it and try to cruft
> > something that could be more pluggable if there is really a need.
> > Thoughts?
>
> Honestly saying, I feel similarly with you:p I personally will do
> something like the following for the original objective.
Are there other opinions? The -1 team is in majority at the end of this thread..
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sandeep Thakkar | 2015-12-08 12:27:08 | Include ppc64le build type for back branches |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-12-08 11:50:39 | Re: Making tab-complete.c easier to maintain |