From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Making tab-complete.c easier to maintain |
Date: | 2015-12-08 11:50:39 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqR7UkYAhiFu=-W6M30Ku-9zSFPQerT1LDLwktyAXzLBQA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
<horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>
> Thank you for looking on this and the comment.
>
> At Mon, 7 Dec 2015 15:00:32 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in <CAB7nPqQ69EPZkOqHAVuZXPxNzb_c2R5hs88tedLYqU9=Zu6xOw(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 2:45 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
> > <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> > > What do you think about this solution?
> >
> > <please do not top-post, it breaks the logic of the thread>
>
> I believe I haven't ripped off any in CC: list or In-Reply-To and
> References in the previous post. (I read "top-post" as a post
> without these headers.) Could you let me know how the message
> was broken?
20151126(dot)144512(dot)10228250(dot)horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp just did that
when you sent this new patch series:
A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/mailing-list-faq/etiquette.html#idp55416272
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-12-08 11:51:56 | Re: psql: add \pset true/false |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2015-12-08 11:43:03 | Re: Rework the way multixact truncations work |