| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com, Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com, peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, marko(at)joh(dot)to, daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: psql: add \pset true/false |
| Date: | 2015-12-09 11:50:47 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqSnivZ=aoBoK5XF5Q3b=xDA0T-Fd3S-E-1h=Dn190fqbw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 7:18 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
> <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> At Sat, 5 Dec 2015 21:05:29 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in <CAB7nPqSXcdM-5nFWDf8zuKmW8j_ooE6zYRqYQasp0fjKxKDX2A(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
>> > Regarding the patch, I
>> > would tend to think that we should just reject it and try to cruft
>> > something that could be more pluggable if there is really a need.
>> > Thoughts?
>>
>> Honestly saying, I feel similarly with you:p I personally will do
>> something like the following for the original objective.
>
> Are there other opinions? The -1 team is in majority at the end of this thread..
So, marking the patch as rejected? Any objections?
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-12-09 12:03:47 | Re: Error with index on unlogged table |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-12-09 11:49:22 | Re: Making tab-complete.c easier to maintain |