| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [bug fix] PG10: libpq doesn't connect to alternative hosts when some errors occur |
| Date: | 2017-05-19 02:08:41 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqSx_Pqt1KXfkJAM2PTa0hwa6Y6S3XSn81_Ej20TjC2tWA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki
<tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
>> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Peter Eisentraut
>> The problem is that if we decide to change the behavior mid-beta, then we'll
>> only have the rest of beta to find out whether people will like the other
>> behavior.
>>
>> I would aim for the behavior that is most suitable for refinement in the
>> future. The current behavior seems to match that.
>
> I think the pre-final release period is the very timing for refinement, in the perspective of users and PG developers as users.
Sure that is the correct period to argue.
> One thing I'm worried is that people here might become more conservative against change once the final version is released.
Any redesign after release would finish by being a new feature, which
would be in this case a new connection parameter or an extra option
that works with the current parameter, say something to allow soft or
hard failures when multiple hosts are defined.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2017-05-19 02:12:23 | Re: Moving relation extension locks out of heavyweight lock manager |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-05-19 02:05:45 | Re: Race conditions with WAL sender PID lookups |