| From: | "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | 'Peter Eisentraut' <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [bug fix] PG10: libpq doesn't connect to alternative hosts when some errors occur |
| Date: | 2017-05-19 02:01:32 |
| Message-ID: | 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F6FAD82@G01JPEXMBYT05 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Peter Eisentraut
> The problem is that if we decide to change the behavior mid-beta, then we'll
> only have the rest of beta to find out whether people will like the other
> behavior.
>
> I would aim for the behavior that is most suitable for refinement in the
> future. The current behavior seems to match that.
I think the pre-final release period is the very timing for refinement, in the perspective of users and PG developers as users. One thing I'm worried is that people here might become more conservative against change once the final version is released.
Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-05-19 02:02:45 | Re: different column orders in regression test database |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-05-19 01:39:49 | Re: Fix refresh_option syntax of ALTER SUBSCRIPTION in document |