| From: | "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | 'Michael Paquier' <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [bug fix] PG10: libpq doesn't connect to alternative hosts when some errors occur |
| Date: | 2017-05-19 02:35:18 |
| Message-ID: | 0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F6FAE0E@G01JPEXMBYT05 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Michael Paquier
> > One thing I'm worried is that people here might become more conservative
> against change once the final version is released.
>
> Any redesign after release would finish by being a new feature, which would
> be in this case a new connection parameter or an extra option that works
> with the current parameter, say something to allow soft or hard failures
> when multiple hosts are defined.
Hmm... but I can't imagine the parameter would be very meaningful for users.
Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bossart, Nathan | 2017-05-19 02:44:22 | Re: [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables in VACUUM commands |
| Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2017-05-19 02:33:48 | Re: Replication status in logical replication |