From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, "Wong, Yi Wen" <yiwong(at)amazon(dot)com>, "Wood, Dan" <hexpert(at)amazon(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix freezing of a dead HOT-updated tuple |
Date: | 2017-10-10 01:00:10 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqSrXiFEkv7Ug8jSmAuH-4tF65pPYATb-J1PzB5KAP86DA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 2:29 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 4:25 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
>> Hmm, I think I added a random sleep (max. 100ms) right after the
>> HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum call in vacuumlazy.c (lazy_scan_heap), and that
>> makes the race easier to hit.
>
> I still cannot reproduce. Perhaps you can be more specific?
I have been trying to reproduce things for a total of 4 hours, testing
various variations of the proposed test cases (killed Postgres,
changed fillfactor, manual sleep calls), but I am proving unable to
see a regression as well. I would not think that the OS matters here,
all my attempts were on macos with assertions and debugging enabled.
At least the code is now more stable, which is definitely a good thing.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2017-10-10 03:33:36 | Re: pgsql: Add pg_strnlen() a portable implementation of strlen. |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2017-10-09 23:15:09 | Re: pgsql: Add pg_strnlen() a portable implementation of strlen. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stas Kelvich | 2017-10-10 01:19:17 | Re: Issues with logical replication |
Previous Message | Fabrízio de Royes Mello | 2017-10-10 00:45:23 | Re: search path security issue? |