Re: pg_ctl promote wait

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_ctl promote wait
Date: 2016-08-08 01:44:57
Message-ID: CAB7nPqSmXXO05J_A41ZvbY=H+Yfc6QfFpCc5ZWfk1TbcGdgXTg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 8/5/16 12:14 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> In do_stop, this patches makes the wait happen for a maximum of
>> wait_seconds * 2, once when getting the control file information, and
>> once when waiting for the server to shut down.
>
> That's not how I read it. get_controlfile() will decrease the
> wait_seconds argument by how much wait time it has used. The wait for
> shutdown will then only use as much seconds as are left.

Ah, right. The reference to wait_seconds gets decremented.

>> This is not a good
>> idea, and the idea of putting a wait argument in get_controlfile does
>> not seem a good interface to me. I'd rather see get_controlfile be
>> extended with a flag saying no_error_on_failure and keep the wait
>> logic within pg_ctl.
>
> I guess we could write a wrapper function in pg_ctl that encapsulated
> the wait logic.

That's what I would do.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-08-08 01:47:09 Re: Slowness of extended protocol
Previous Message Tsunakawa, Takayuki 2016-08-08 01:17:05 Re: [RFC] Change the default of update_process_title to off