| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Shay Rojansky <roji(at)roji(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Slowness of extended protocol |
| Date: | 2016-08-08 01:47:09 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoY3kbrTRHxAG_FLinttRGbU+ZCX=s=VGYpWSbAU6R1j8A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 7:46 PM, Shay Rojansky <roji(at)roji(dot)org> wrote:
> We could call this "protocol 3.1" since it doesn't break backwards
> compatibility (no incompatible server-initiated message changes, but it does
> include a feature that won't be supported by servers which only support 3.0.
> This could be a sort of "semantic versioning" for the protocol - optional
> new client-initiated features are a minor version bump, others are a major
> version bump...
I wouldn't try to do that; we've done nothing similar in past
instances where we've added new protocol or sub-protocol messages,
which has happened at least for COPY BOTH mode within recent memory.
See d3d414696f39e2b57072fab3dd4fa11e465be4ed.
> This new client-initiated message would be similar to query, except that it
> would include the parameter and result-related fields from Bind. The
> responses would be identical to the responses for the Query message.
>
> Does this make sense?
I think so.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Noah Misch | 2016-08-08 01:50:40 | Re: No longer possible to query catalogs for index capabilities? |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-08-08 01:44:57 | Re: pg_ctl promote wait |