Re: Commit fest status for 2015-11

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Commit fest status for 2015-11
Date: 2015-12-24 12:45:40
Message-ID: CAB7nPqSf0coo+ONmOi0UWLGHeh-FGEQaaPuM=6v-UfKZgMT3yw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Michael Paquier
>> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> OK, if those don't get addressed soon, they will be moved to the next
>>> CF with the same status.
>>
>> After a first pass, Numbers are getting down, I am just too tired to continue:
>> Needs review: 13.
>> Waiting on Author: 15.
>> Ready for Committer: 5
>>
>> Two additional patches have been marked as ready for committer:
>> 1) Bug fix for pg_dump --jobs when password is passed a a parameter in
>> a connection string:
>> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/7/405/
>> 2) Default roles, in Stephen's plate:
>> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/7/49/
>
> I had a look at all the remaining entries and treated each one of
> them, patches marked as ready for committer have been moved to next CF
> with the same status. There are currently 3 remaining entries in the
> CF app where it would be cool authors and/or reviewers give a status
> of the situation. Once this is addressed the CF of 2015-11 will be
> closed.
>
> Note particularly to authors: if your patch has been returned with
> feedback, but you are still working on it, please make sure that it is
> moved to next CF soon. Or, if your patch has been moved to next CF,
> *but* you are not working on it, it would be nice to mark it as
> returned with feedback in 2016-01.

And the CF is no closed. Here is the final score:
Committed: 30.
Moved to next CF: 42.
Rejected: 9.
Returned with Feedback: 22.
Total: 103.
Regards,
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2015-12-24 13:51:15 Re: WIP: bloom filter in Hash Joins with batches
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2015-12-24 12:42:31 Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers