Re: Commit fest status for 2015-11

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Commit fest status for 2015-11
Date: 2015-12-25 19:55:54
Message-ID: 20151225195554.GA16006@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 09:45:40PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Michael Paquier
> > <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Michael Paquier
> >> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >>> OK, if those don't get addressed soon, they will be moved to the next
> >>> CF with the same status.
> >>
> >> After a first pass, Numbers are getting down, I am just too tired to continue:
> >> Needs review: 13.
> >> Waiting on Author: 15.
> >> Ready for Committer: 5
> >>
> >> Two additional patches have been marked as ready for committer:
> >> 1) Bug fix for pg_dump --jobs when password is passed a a parameter in
> >> a connection string:
> >> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/7/405/
> >> 2) Default roles, in Stephen's plate:
> >> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/7/49/
> >
> > I had a look at all the remaining entries and treated each one of
> > them, patches marked as ready for committer have been moved to next CF
> > with the same status. There are currently 3 remaining entries in the
> > CF app where it would be cool authors and/or reviewers give a status
> > of the situation. Once this is addressed the CF of 2015-11 will be
> > closed.
> >
> > Note particularly to authors: if your patch has been returned with
> > feedback, but you are still working on it, please make sure that it is
> > moved to next CF soon. Or, if your patch has been moved to next CF,
> > *but* you are not working on it, it would be nice to mark it as
> > returned with feedback in 2016-01.
>
> And the CF is no closed. Here is the final score:
> Committed: 30.
> Moved to next CF: 42.
> Rejected: 9.
> Returned with Feedback: 22.
> Total: 103.
> Regards,

Thanks very much for doing the thankless!

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2015-12-25 21:13:26 Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794
Previous Message Васильев Дмитрий 2015-12-25 19:52:12 Re: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794