Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers
Date: 2015-12-24 12:42:31
Message-ID: CAB7nPqScue4rDn7C-ayG9h77mdnR-_8-J_uGzp7U=yVagUQ0QQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
>> Ashutosh, others, this thread has been stalling for more than 1 month
>> and a half. There is a new patch that still applies (be careful of
>> whitespaces btw), but no reviews came in. So what should we do? I
>> would tend to move this patch to the next CF because of a lack of
>> reviews.
>
>
> Yes, that would help. Thanks.

Done.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2015-12-24 12:45:40 Re: Commit fest status for 2015-11
Previous Message Ildus Kurbangaliev 2015-12-24 12:32:09 Re: Review: GiST support for UUIDs