Re: FPW compression leaks information

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FPW compression leaks information
Date: 2015-07-09 13:05:28
Message-ID: CAB7nPqS2OyzxwxQVXDaCJf2Yh3M4zRZsw9oKD44wBYcy6AUTng@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
> ISTM that one our consensus is to make wal_compression SUSET
> as the first step whatever approach we adopt for the risk in question
> later. So, barring any objection, I will commit the attached patch
> and change the context to PGC_SUSET.

That's surely a step in the good direction. Thanks.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2015-07-09 13:09:34 Re: Improving log capture of TAP tests with IPC::Run
Previous Message desmodemone 2015-07-09 12:38:22 [ANNOUNCE] PGDay.IT 2015 - Call for Papers