Re: FPW compression leaks information

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FPW compression leaks information
Date: 2015-07-09 13:32:24
Message-ID: CAHGQGwGfmSBr4Eq0A-Hhmn_HEVJ0uufLNxgg7tEBEQ+juP9wqw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:05 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> ISTM that one our consensus is to make wal_compression SUSET
>> as the first step whatever approach we adopt for the risk in question
>> later. So, barring any objection, I will commit the attached patch
>> and change the context to PGC_SUSET.
>
> That's surely a step in the good direction. Thanks.

Yep, pushed!

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2015-07-09 13:33:41 Re: Fillfactor for GIN indexes
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2015-07-09 13:18:55 Re: Improving log capture of TAP tests with IPC::Run