Re: [BUG] pg_basebackup from disconnected standby fails

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] pg_basebackup from disconnected standby fails
Date: 2016-07-21 03:20:30
Message-ID: CAB7nPqR+krKK9fqwquSJnA2oB-RcQ6Mi8ybz3WL0kCOB5SSZEg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 7:28 AM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 8:56 PM, Michael Paquier
>> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, I think that is totally different angle to fix this issue, so
>>>> don't you think it is better to start a separate thread to discuss
>>>> about it for 10.0 and mark this patch as ready for committer.
>>>
>>> I'd like to tackle this problem in 10.0, but that will strongly depend
>>> on how my patches move on in CF1 and CF2.
>>
>> By the way, thank you for taking the time to provide input. I think
>> we're in good shape here now.
>>
>
> So, if I understand correctly, then we can mark the version posted by
> you upthread [1] which includes a test along with Kyotaro's fix can be
> marked as Ready for committer. If so, then please change the status
> of patch accordingly.

Oops. I thought you did it already. So done.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2016-07-21 03:28:57 Re: Design for In-Core Logical Replication
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2016-07-21 03:05:25 Re: Design for In-Core Logical Replication