Re: [BUG] pg_basebackup from disconnected standby fails

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] pg_basebackup from disconnected standby fails
Date: 2016-07-21 02:56:03
Message-ID: CAA4eK1JGBHkn47m-k0L5o1VOzjvMOY9cFm2WfF8yZGf-VsFghw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 7:28 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 8:56 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Yeah, I think that is totally different angle to fix this issue, so
>>> don't you think it is better to start a separate thread to discuss
>>> about it for 10.0 and mark this patch as ready for committer.
>>
>> I'd like to tackle this problem in 10.0, but that will strongly depend
>> on how my patches move on in CF1 and CF2.
>
> By the way, thank you for taking the time to provide input. I think
> we're in good shape here now.
>

So, if I understand correctly, then we can mark the version posted by
you upthread [1] which includes a test along with Kyotaro's fix can be
marked as Ready for committer. If so, then please change the status
of patch accordingly.

[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB7nPqTv5gmKQcNDoFGTGqoqXz2xLz4RRw247oqOJzZTVy6-7Q%40mail.gmail.com

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2016-07-21 03:05:25 Re: Design for In-Core Logical Replication
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2016-07-21 01:58:05 Re: [BUG] pg_basebackup from disconnected standby fails