| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, jobin(dot)augustine(at)openscg(dot)com, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken |
| Date: | 2017-08-17 01:32:03 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqQf_zKUsopaGNjEFM_nyoDk5H+51Ng4fv8uDL_iUmnJ5Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> He meant logical replication,
>
> Oh I could not find he meant logical replication in the original
> report.
The second message of the thread says so, but the first does not
mention logical replication at all.
From here are mentioned PG 9.6 and pg_basebackup:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHBggj8g2T+ZDcACZ2FmzX9CTxkWjKBsHd6NkYB4i9Ojf6K1Fw@mail.gmail.com.
Explaining the confusion.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2017-08-17 01:50:30 | Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken |
| Previous Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2017-08-17 00:15:25 | Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2017-08-17 01:33:50 | Re: Function to move the position of a replication slot |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-08-17 01:25:48 | Re: Function to move the position of a replication slot |