Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken

From: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com
Cc: michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com, ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp, jobin(dot)augustine(at)openscg(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, andres(at)anarazel(dot)de, noah(at)leadboat(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken
Date: 2017-08-17 00:15:25
Message-ID: 20170817.091525.126965570414364180.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

> He meant logical replication,

Oh I could not find he meant logical replication in the original
report.

> but the code in question here is the same
> for streaming replication, or whatever it's called.

Yes.

Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-08-17 01:32:03 Re: [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2017-08-17 00:14:02 Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2017-08-17 00:15:26 Re: Atomics for heap_parallelscan_nextpage()
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 2017-08-17 00:14:02 Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken