Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken

From: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, jobin(dot)augustine(at)openscg(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, andres(at)anarazel(dot)de, noah(at)leadboat(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken
Date: 2017-08-17 01:50:30
Message-ID: 20170817.105030.959693446284516692.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>>> He meant logical replication,
>>
>> Oh I could not find he meant logical replication in the original
>> report.
>
> The second message of the thread says so, but the first does not
> mention logical replication at all.
>>From here are mentioned PG 9.6 and pg_basebackup:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHBggj8g2T+ZDcACZ2FmzX9CTxkWjKBsHd6NkYB4i9Ojf6K1Fw@mail.gmail.com.
> Explaining the confusion.

Oh, I see it now. Thanks.

Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2017-08-17 04:37:42 Re: [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-08-17 01:32:03 Re: [BUGS] Replication to Postgres 10 on Windows is broken

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-08-17 01:52:31 Re: Extra Vietnamese unaccent rules
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2017-08-17 01:47:12 Re: Broken link to DocBook XSL Stylesheets