Re: Add comment explaining why queryid is int64 in pg_stat_statements

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Lukas Fittl <lukas(at)fittl(dot)com>, Shaik Mohammad Mujeeb <mujeeb(dot)sk(at)zohocorp(dot)com>, ilyaevdokimov <ilya(dot)evdokimov(at)tantorlabs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, mujeebskdev <mujeeb(dot)sk(dot)dev(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>
Subject: Re: Add comment explaining why queryid is int64 in pg_stat_statements
Date: 2025-05-30 11:09:23
Message-ID: CAApHDvrWTGZyrNgC2VRKwwC7dn2Epa23xku2qczudB7oqyVn=w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 30 May 2025 at 11:51, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 30 May 2025 at 11:35, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> > Thanks, Nathan. Let's proceed with the change then. David, would you
> > prefer handling the patch you have written by yourself for the query
> > ID part?
>
> Yes. I'll look at that again shortly.

Now done.

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ajin Cherian 2025-05-30 11:11:28 Re: Proposal: Filter irrelevant change before reassemble transactions during logical decoding
Previous Message David Rowley 2025-05-30 11:08:58 Re: Add comment explaining why queryid is int64 in pg_stat_statements