Re: Add comment explaining why queryid is int64 in pg_stat_statements

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Lukas Fittl <lukas(at)fittl(dot)com>, Shaik Mohammad Mujeeb <mujeeb(dot)sk(at)zohocorp(dot)com>, ilyaevdokimov <ilya(dot)evdokimov(at)tantorlabs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, mujeebskdev <mujeeb(dot)sk(dot)dev(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>
Subject: Re: Add comment explaining why queryid is int64 in pg_stat_statements
Date: 2025-05-31 00:44:01
Message-ID: aDpQ0dXITwlAmfXT@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 11:09:23PM +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> Now done.

Cool, thanks. Just did the same for the query ID, closing the open
item.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2025-05-31 00:48:52 Re: Speedup truncations of temporary relation forks
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2025-05-31 00:13:45 Re: POC: Carefully exposing information without authentication