| From: | Alfredo De Luca <alfredo(dot)deluca(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz |
| Cc: | prince(dot)pathria(at)goevive(dot)com, pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: postgresql and glusterFS |
| Date: | 2018-09-13 10:37:48 |
| Message-ID: | CAAWpFTHpYx3nYe5E_EEhEaOyXf82vqemW1hcQo5WAfKHrEOgug@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
thanks everybody. I don't think we can use ceph (which I would prefere
anyway) as we have already glusterFS for other stuff.
thanks heaps
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 12:05 PM Mark Kirkwood <
mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz> wrote:
> On 12/09/18 21:11, Prince Pathria wrote:
>
> > Hey Alfredo,
> >
> > You can set up ceph as back end/data storage for postgres. Moreover
> > you'll get a better community support as well.
> >
>
> I'd add a +1 for Ceph as opposed to Gluster. Great community support and
> a better designed product.
>
> Where I work, we run an Openstack Cloud with Ceph as the backing for the
> block storage provider (Cinder). A number of customers use Postgres and
> Mysql on this setup.
>
> regards
> Mark
>
--
*Alfredo*
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pierre Ochsenbein | 2018-09-13 11:48:34 | monitoring tool |
| Previous Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2018-09-13 10:05:15 | Re: postgresql and glusterFS |