Re: postgresql and glusterFS

From: Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>
To: Prince Pathria <prince(dot)pathria(at)goevive(dot)com>, alfredo(dot)deluca(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: postgresql and glusterFS
Date: 2018-09-13 10:05:15
Message-ID: 33d48b8d-c5db-5f3e-102c-d6adf1f8defb@catalyst.net.nz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On 12/09/18 21:11, Prince Pathria wrote:

> Hey Alfredo,
>
> You can set up ceph as back end/data storage for postgres. Moreover
> you'll get a better community support as well.
>

I'd add a +1 for Ceph as opposed to Gluster. Great community support and
a better designed product.

Where I work, we run an Openstack Cloud with Ceph as the backing for the
block storage provider (Cinder). A number of customers use Postgres and
Mysql on this setup.

regards
Mark

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alfredo De Luca 2018-09-13 10:37:48 Re: postgresql and glusterFS
Previous Message Flavio Henrique Araque Gurgel 2018-09-13 10:03:15 Re: postgresql and glusterFS