Re: Assert("vacrel->eager_scan_remaining_successes > 0")

From: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Assert("vacrel->eager_scan_remaining_successes > 0")
Date: 2025-05-22 20:19:41
Message-ID: CAAKRu_aBkNpb_4n6Rm=J5igVRTmzO09EFpUaaq3LogHSbkckNA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 4:07 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Agreed. I've updated the patch. Does this address your comments?

Yep. LGTM.

I'd probably just remove the parenthetical remark about 20% from the
commit message since that only applies to the success cap and
referencing both the success and failure caps will make the sentence
very long.

from the commit message:
pages (beyond 20% of the total number of all-visible but not
all-frozen pages), this does not pose a practical concern as the

Thanks again for writing the patch!

- Melanie

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2025-05-22 20:19:53 Re: [Util] Warn and Remove Invalid GUCs
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2025-05-22 20:17:30 Re: Log connection establishment timings