Re: Regression in statement locations

From: Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin(dot)bonnefoy(at)datadoghq(dot)com>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgbackrest(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Regression in statement locations
Date: 2025-05-20 11:34:39
Message-ID: CAA5RZ0v3uWgc3FiyV7DD0QB+LmBS4tDRPeb-t64DVGtkL5Wzgw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tested the patch and it looks good to me.

Not that I thought it would fail, but I also confirmed the pgaudit case
works as expected.

```
LOG: AUDIT: SESSION,10,2,DDL,CREATE TABLE,,,"CREATE TABLE do_table
(""weird name""
INT)",<not logged>
LOG: AUDIT: SESSION,10,3,DDL,DROP TABLE,,,DROP table do_table,<not logged>
DO
```

--
Sami

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2025-05-20 11:41:06 Re: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication
Previous Message David Rowley 2025-05-20 11:28:17 Re: Add comment explaining why queryid is int64 in pg_stat_statements