Re: Regression in statement locations

From: David Steele <david(at)pgbackrest(dot)org>
To: Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin(dot)bonnefoy(at)datadoghq(dot)com>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Regression in statement locations
Date: 2025-05-20 14:04:20
Message-ID: 0546d531-50eb-4ffc-b046-987cae4ab4f6@pgbackrest.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 5/20/25 07:34, Sami Imseih wrote:
> Tested the patch and it looks good to me.
>
> Not that I thought it would fail, but I also confirmed the pgaudit case
> works as expected.

I also tested and everything looks good with the patch.

I did a careful examination of the remaining diffs (there are quite a
few) and in every case I consider them to be beneficial, i.e. they make
the output more targeted and readable.

I did not do a real code review, but I did notice that the test table
column is called weird_name as in our tests. I would argue that since it
is missing the quotes and space it is not really all that weird and
should maybe get a normal name so developers in the future don't wonder
what is weird about it.

Thank you for this improvement and the quick fix!

Regards,
-David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nazir Bilal Yavuz 2025-05-20 14:15:54 Re: PG 18 release notes draft committed
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2025-05-20 13:52:17 Re: PG 18 release notes draft committed