| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Rajeev rastogi <rajeev(dot)rastogi(at)huawei(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Autonomous Transaction (WIP) |
| Date: | 2014-07-01 06:29:40 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1LrUed_=L+ZP7zgLNMAXd3uhRgKiiJp2EWm+SJGqORkVA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Rajeev rastogi <rajeev(dot)rastogi(at)huawei(dot)com>
wrote:
> On 30 June 2014 22:50, Pavel Stehule Wrote:
>
> >I didn't find a related message.
> >?
>
> I think there have been some confusion, the design idea were never
rejected but yes there were few feedback/ concern, which I had clarified.
Also some of the other concerns are already fixed in latest patch.
Simon has mentioned that exactly this idea has been rejected at
PGCon 2 years back. Please refer that in below mail:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/BF2827DCCE55594C8D7A8F7FFD3AB7713DDE136A@SZXEML508-MBX.china.huawei.com
As far as I can see, you never came back with the different solution.
Have you checked the discussion in Developer meeting notes. Please
check the same at below link:
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PgCon_2012_Developer_Meeting#Autonomous_Transactions
> So I wanted to have this patch in commitfest application, so that we can
have a healthy discussion and rectify all the issues.
> But now I see that this patch has already been moved to rejected
category, which will put break on further review.
I believe ideally this patch should have been marked as
"Returned with feedback" as you already got a feedback long
back and never come up with solution for same.
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2014-07-01 06:36:20 | Re: IMPORT FOREIGN SCHEMA statement |
| Previous Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2014-07-01 06:27:12 | Re: inherit support for foreign tables |