| From: | Rajeev rastogi <rajeev(dot)rastogi(at)huawei(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Autonomous Transaction (WIP) |
| Date: | 2014-07-01 06:16:38 |
| Message-ID: | BF2827DCCE55594C8D7A8F7FFD3AB7713DE134B6@SZXEML508-MBX.china.huawei.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 30 June 2014 22:50, Pavel Stehule Wrote:
2014-06-30 12:38 GMT+02:00 Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com<mailto:ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>>:
>>If I understand correctly, the design of this patch has already been
>>considered earlier and rejected. So I guess the patch should also be
>>marked rejected?
>I didn't find a related message.
>?
I think there have been some confusion, the design idea were never rejected but yes there were few feedback/ concern, which I had clarified. Also some of the other concerns are already fixed in latest patch.
So I wanted to have this patch in commitfest application, so that we can have a healthy discussion and rectify all the issues.
But now I see that this patch has already been moved to rejected category, which will put break on further review.
So is there any way to bring back and continue reviewing this patch.
Please let me know if any issue or I am missing something.
Thanks and Regards,
Kumar Rajeev Rastogi
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2014-07-01 06:22:50 | Re: Autonomous Transaction (WIP) |
| Previous Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2014-07-01 06:13:45 | Re: inherit support for foreign tables |