Re: Added missing invalidations for all tables publication

On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 7:57 AM houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com
<houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > From Mon, Sep 6, 2021 1:56 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 8:54 PM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > > Thanks for the comments, the attached v3 patch has the changes for
> > > > the same.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I think this bug should be fixed in back branches (till v10). OTOH, as
> > > this is not reported by any user and we have found it during code
> > > review so it seems either users don't have an exact use case or they
> > > haven't noticed this yet. What do you people think about back-patching?
> >
> > Personally, I think it's ok to back-patch.
>
> I found that the patch cannot be applied to back-branches(v10-v14) cleanly,
> so, I generate the patches for back-branches. Attached, all the patches have
> passed regression test.
>

Pushed!

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.