Re: Added missing invalidations for all tables publication

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Added missing invalidations for all tables publication
Date: 2021-09-11 18:28:47
Message-ID: 105576.1631384927@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 7:57 AM houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com
> <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>> I found that the patch cannot be applied to back-branches(v10-v14) cleanly,
>> so, I generate the patches for back-branches. Attached, all the patches have
>> passed regression test.

> Pushed!

Shouldn't the CF entry for this be closed? [1]

regards, tom lane

[1] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/34/3311/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-09-11 18:42:42 Re: new regexp_*(text, text, int) functions crash
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-09-11 18:19:04 Re: pg_upgrade test for binary compatibility of core data types