| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com, houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com, wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com, smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com, shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply |
| Date: | 2023-04-24 03:29:07 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1KRywFoqbA5C1oQM7+LqabD8PT=fACdnY6_qDi+hG1KvQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 8:40 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi
<horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> At Mon, 24 Apr 2023 11:50:37 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
> > In my opinion, it is fine to replace the Assert with an ERROR.
>
> Sorry for posting multiple times in a row, but I'm a bit unceratin
> whether we should use FATAL or ERROR for this situation. The stream is
> not provided by user, and the session or process cannot continue.
>
I think ERROR should be fine here similar to other cases in worker.c.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2023-04-24 03:46:04 | Re: Support logical replication of DDLs |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2023-04-24 03:15:13 | Re: Autogenerate some wait events code and documentation |