Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com, houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com, wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com, smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com, shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply
Date: 2023-04-24 03:10:12
Message-ID: 20230424.121012.450464895089626373.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At Mon, 24 Apr 2023 11:50:37 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
> In my opinion, it is fine to replace the Assert with an ERROR.

Sorry for posting multiple times in a row, but I'm a bit unceratin
whether we should use FATAL or ERROR for this situation. The stream is
not provided by user, and the session or process cannot continue.

regards.

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2023-04-24 03:15:13 Re: Autogenerate some wait events code and documentation
Previous Message shaurya jain 2023-04-24 02:59:44 Re: Logical replication failed with SSL SYSCALL error