Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply

From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com, houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com, wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com, smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com, shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply
Date: 2023-04-24 04:03:03
Message-ID: 20230424.130303.1463059691915863881.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At Mon, 24 Apr 2023 08:59:07 +0530, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
> > Sorry for posting multiple times in a row, but I'm a bit unceratin
> > whether we should use FATAL or ERROR for this situation. The stream is
> > not provided by user, and the session or process cannot continue.
> >
>
> I think ERROR should be fine here similar to other cases in worker.c.

Sure, I don't have any issues with it.

regards.

--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message vignesh C 2023-04-24 04:04:54 Re: Add two missing tests in 035_standby_logical_decoding.pl
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2023-04-24 03:46:04 Re: Support logical replication of DDLs