Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Date: 2021-04-01 03:28:49
Message-ID: CAA4eK1JK--7gzy2PkdQ4VVGjvD6RxJ78mE463_5rC0BfwmhzdQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 5:34 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Please find attached the latest patch set v68*
>

I think this patch is in much better shape than it was few versions
earlier but I feel still some more work and testing is required. We
can try to make it work with the streaming option and do something
about empty prepare transactions to reduce the need for users to set a
much higher value for max_prepared_xacts on subscribers. So, I propose
to move it to the next CF, what do you think?

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2021-04-01 03:30:09 Re: [PATCH] add concurrent_abort callback for output plugin
Previous Message Arseny Sher 2021-04-01 03:11:50 Re: Flaky vacuum truncate test in reloptions.sql