Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions

From: Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Date: 2021-04-01 05:58:28
Message-ID: CAFPTHDb4RrXNzia7XWaYRJdeGnfougbBLodmb3WsZJRLTO+xLg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 2:29 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 5:34 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Please find attached the latest patch set v68*
> >
>
> I think this patch is in much better shape than it was few versions
> earlier but I feel still some more work and testing is required. We
> can try to make it work with the streaming option and do something
> about empty prepare transactions to reduce the need for users to set a
> much higher value for max_prepared_xacts on subscribers. So, I propose
> to move it to the next CF, what do you think?
>
>
I agree.

regards,
Ajin Cherian
Fujitsu Australia

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2021-04-01 05:59:03 Re: Add client connection check during the execution of the query
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2021-04-01 04:28:19 Re: Flaky vacuum truncate test in reloptions.sql