Re: Command Triggers, patch v11

From: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Command Triggers, patch v11
Date: 2012-03-03 00:08:33
Message-ID: CAA-aLv5paBN4P-cXUsu=KMQva-SCSjo9MpzM6szYFt5wqeFkeg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2 March 2012 23:33, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2 March 2012 22:32, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr> wrote:
>>>> test=# CREATE TABLE badname (id int, a int, b text);
>>>> ERROR:  invalid relation name: badname
>>>> test=# CREATE TABLE badname AS SELECT 1::int id, 1::int a, ''::text b;
>>>> SELECT 1
>>>>
>>>> This doesn't even get picked up by ANY COMMAND.
>>
>> I think Andres should add an entry for his patch on the commitfest.  Is
>> it ok?
>
> I'll try Andres' patch this weekend while I test yours.

Actually no matter which patch I apply first, they cause the other to
fail to apply.

--
Thom

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-03-03 00:12:46 Re: Command Triggers, patch v11
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-03-03 00:01:24 Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation)