Re: Command Triggers, patch v11

From: "anarazel(at)anarazel(dot)de" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Command Triggers, patch v11
Date: 2012-03-03 00:39:13
Message-ID: b5b4ae01-b209-4ac5-9945-b6815a77f2b5@email.android.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"anarazel(at)anarazel(dot)de" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> schrieb:

>
>
>Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> schrieb:
>
>>On 2 March 2012 23:33, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On 2 March 2012 22:32, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>
>>wrote:
>>>>>> test=# CREATE TABLE badname (id int, a int, b text);
>>>>>> ERROR:  invalid relation name: badname
>>>>>> test=# CREATE TABLE badname AS SELECT 1::int id, 1::int a,
>>''::text b;
>>>>>> SELECT 1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This doesn't even get picked up by ANY COMMAND.
>>>>
>>>> I think Andres should add an entry for his patch on the commitfest.
>> Is
>>>> it ok?
>>>
>>> I'll try Andres' patch this weekend while I test yours.
>>
>>Actually no matter which patch I apply first, they cause the other to
>>fail to apply.
>I will try to fix that on the plain tomorrow (to NYC) but I am not yet
>sure when/where I will have internet access again.
One more try: To the list.

Andres

Please excuse the brevity and formatting - I am writing this on my mobile phone.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thom Brown 2012-03-03 00:56:12 Re: Command Triggers, patch v11
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-03-03 00:12:46 Re: Command Triggers, patch v11