| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, mikael(dot)kjellstrom(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Direct I/O |
| Date: | 2023-04-30 06:35:30 |
| Message-ID: | CA+hUKGLUNv4vaBvMq3Kx6de32T9An2_KXC8Q0DqCY2jtHkfXvA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 4:11 PM Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> Speaking of the developer-only status, I find the io_direct name more enticing
> than force_parallel_mode, which PostgreSQL renamed due to overuse from people
> expecting non-developer benefits. Should this have a name starting with
> debug_?
Hmm, yeah I think people coming from other databases would be tempted
by it. But, unlike the
please-jam-a-gather-node-on-top-of-the-plan-so-I-can-debug-the-parallel-executor
switch, I think of this thing more like an experimental feature that
is just waiting for more features to make it useful. What about a
warning message about that at startup if it's on?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2023-04-30 12:57:39 | Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner |
| Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2023-04-30 05:21:27 | Re: replacing role-level NOINHERIT with a grant-level option |